We love it! We hate it! Here’s what we want! Windows Red...

We love it! We hate it! Here’s what we want! Windows Red reconsidered

SHARE

If you like Windows 8, you’ll like — maybe even love — Windows 8.1 “Blue.” But if you’re a denizen of the old-fashioned Desktop world without a yearning for touch and/or you don’t want your PC to act like a smartphone, Windows 8.1 will disappoint — big time.

InfoWorld’s detailed proposal for a new, better Windows 8 — called Windows Red — has sparked accolades, criticism, outrage, hundreds of comments, and more than a few very good suggestions. The New York Times’s David Pogue said, “It’s solid. It’s doable. The only serious downside to splitting up Windows is the huge servings of crow and humble pie that Microsoft would  have to consume.” Time Magazine’s Harry McCracken said, “It seems highly unlikely, however, that Microsoft will buy into Windows  Red’s overarching design principle: disentangling the Desktop and the  Metro Start screen so that nobody’s shoved into a radically new  interface against his or her will.”

Windows Red

Microsoft’s Windows 8 strategy has gone down in flames.

InfoWorld has a plan to rescue it from the ashes.

For more Windows Red and the latest on Windows 8, visit the Windows Red home page.

But it’s not just high-profile tech pundits who’ve shared their take on Windows Red. Here’s the best of the best of what we’ve seen to date.

The Windows defenders Some of those commenting love Windows 8, and they look forward to Windows “Blue” 8.1 with enthusiasm.

Liam Proven: “Microsoft is trying to bridge the world of the iPad and $45 Chinese Android tablet, because that’s the way that personal computing is manifestly already going. [With Windows Red], you’re trying to reinforce the split. You want to keep the old WIMP desktop that you, as geeks, know and love. Well, ordinary people don’t know it and don’t love it — that’s why iOS and Android is selling so well.”

MCTronix: “No!  Microsoft needs to stay on track. They have the right idea.”

The Windows critics Others took to the boards to vent their spleens at Microsoft’s failures.

David Golani: “Microsoft doesn’t understand the market. Data integration and sharing is important, not a unified OS. Apple keeps its desktop and tablet interfaces separate, but there is a lot of integration between the two. Playing a a movie on your tablet and sending the video output to your Apple TV is a snap, for example. You do not need to have both running the same OS to do this!”

The Windows Red critics Some people felt that Windows Red doesn’t solve the real problem in Windows 8 — and several took us to task for taking the Metro environment off PCs, for taking the legacy Desktop environment off tablets, and for designing Windows Red to force a reboot when moving between the desktop-style Pro and Metro-style Mobile versions when using a hybrid device.

Adrian Werner: “Separating Metro and Desktop is a terrible, terrible idea. What’s more … it’s a completely backward one that could [have made] sense 10 years ago, but not anymore. ”

Yoyoegg: “A reboot when you snap on a keyboard to the tablet? C’mon, son!”

Duuuude: “Your proposal works fine for desktops, laptops, and tablets. Your proposal fails for the most interesting device, the hybrid laptop/tablet.”

Jeff Stucker: “[Re-booting on the switch to Mobile] is not only inelegant, it’s absurd. I’ve been using pen- and touch-enabled Windows tablets for five years now (XP, Vista, Windows 7, and Windows 8) — mostly in Desktop mode, but also in tablet Metro mode when traveling. It’s the grab-and-go nature of Windows 8 that I like. ”

The Windows Red fans Others believe that Windows Red hits the nail on the head.

LordZordec: “if Windows Red was a real product, I would upgrade tomorrow.”

Alcamtar: “This article describes what Windows 8 should have been. ”

Pko66: “Windows Red Pro could be usable in a corporate environment without some crazy upgrade and training investments that make Windows 8.x unfeasible in any medium or larger company.”

Ricky: “If only you guys ran the Windows division” — a fate I’m not sure I’d wish on my worst enemy.

Where people thought Windows should go There were lots and lots of suggestions for moving beyond Windows 8.

Sergmis: “Windows 8 (or any unified touch interface) won’t catch on till we get rid of the keyboard and mouse.  See the desk in the movie ‘Oblivion’?  It’s already here. The interface can scale to the size of the device maintaining core GUI elements across phone, tablet, and desk. Microsoft should make this desk, then license the technology. Apple will probably do it before Microsoft does.”

Dennis Barr: “The demise of the Windows ‘standard’ for desktops … there’s no evidence that this is changing. What is changing is the place of the desktop at the apex of the computing space; that spot is under threat as more and more mobile devices come into use.”

Jason Charnov: “Microsoft is trying to exit the desktop OS business without losing the desktop application market. It can see that the future is application ubiquity and that the platform doesn’t really matter and needs to get out of the way.”

Shizuppy: “Keep in mind that Windows 8 is less of an OS and more of a marketing platform for the Windows Store. Windows 9 will be even more so. Understand that and you’ll understand everything.”

Ben Snyder: “You got the branding all wrong. Nobody cares about the Windows brand anymore. It’s been ruined since Vista. The last Windows version people loved was XP. XP actually has cache. They should rename Surface to Window and have it run an OS called XP.”

Mcswell: “How about Microsoft Office Red? With menus, instead of hieroglyphics.”

The New York Times’s Pogue summed up what Microsoft needs to do first: “But you know what? Ask the makers of New Coke, or Apple Maps. Sometimes, the best thing for your customers and your company is to admit you’ve committed a colossal blunder — and set to work undoing it.”

Precisely.

This article originally appeared at infoworld.com by Woody Leonhard. Thank you. TiA.

NO COMMENTS

Comments are closed.